Introducing NuGet
Today at work, I gave a presentation on NuGet. I’ve suggested they consider it as an option to ease management of the open source dependencies of our major application, so it was natural that I present the pros and cons.
NuGet is a system for managing .NET packages. It’s not unlike RubyGems or CPAN (for Ruby and Perl respectively), and while it has some work to do to be on par with those alternatives, they’re off to a very good start. Today’s presentation focused on just a few the capabilities of NuGet, and I’ll recap a few from my presentation in this post.
The primary use case for NuGet is the management of open source dependencies in a .NET application. There are a number of key open source libraries that .NET developers like me have been using in projects for years. Upgrades were always a pain because of having to manage their dependencies manually. Many of these tools (NHibernate, NUnit, log4net, and more) are already available as NuGet packages at the NuGet Gallery. I used NHibernate and NUnit in my examples today. Another tool that proved quite useful in my demo was the NuGet Package Explorer. Some of its features include:
- Opening and downloading packages from remote feeds
- Opening local packages to view and change their metadata and contents
- Creating new packages (instead of fiddling with XML manually)
I wrapped up my presentation with two different examples of building NuGet packages without a manually-created .nuspec file as a starting point. The documentation provides examples of how to generate a .nuspec file from an existing DLL, and how to generate a NuGet package from a .csproj or .vbproj file. I published the rules engine (which I found in an answer to a stackoverflow.com question), and a test assembly I created to the NuGet Gallery earlier this evening. If you want to check them out, just search for Arpc.RulesEngine in the NuGet Gallery. I still need to publish the rules engine source as a package and/or push it to a symbol server. Once the enterprise story for NuGet becomes a bit clearer, I hope I have an opportunity to present on that as well.